On Eric Sogard

Eric Sogard, last year’s 81st pick in the MLB amateur draft, is off to one hell of a start with Hi-A Lake Elsinore.  Granted, at 21 going on 22 Sogard is a little old for the level, but it’s only his second year of pro ball.  And he appears to be making serious strides.  His pro debut was nothing to write home about, but he made the adjustment to wooden bats by hitting around if a little below league average.

Through roughly 130 PA this season having been bumped up a level from Low to High Single A, Sogard is doing basically everything better than he did last year.  He has seen an increase in his isolated power, walk rate and line drive rate while simultaneously cutting his strikeout rate significantly.  And while there may be no such thing as a doubles hitter, Sogard is at least doing a fine impression of one by hitting a double in 15% of his at-bats.

His overall line of .388/.496/.553 is well above impressive, but it is also not sustainable primarily thanks to a ridiculous .430 BABIP.  A .430 BABIP is what you’d expect from a line drive rate over 30%, not Sogard’s 17% which suggests something closer to a .300 BABIP perhaps higher given the lower quality of fielding faced in Single A.  And of course, 130 PA isn’t much to go on, but Sogard was a high draft pick and has a mature plate approach, so he’s definitely someone to keep an eye on.

On Justin Germano

Now, we all know that Justin’s not going to maintain an ERA of 0.00 or even one within three runs of it. That said, Germano’s peripherals certainly support the thought that he has improved substantially and he wasn’t that bad before.

H/9 K/9 BB/9 K/BB
Career 9.24 5.58 3.10 1.80
2007 8.98 5.27 2.70 1.95
2008 4.85 4.15 2.08 2.00

You’ll see that he’s striking out and walking fewer batters, but that his ratio between the two has improved. Also, you can see that his hit rate is unsustainable.

LD% xBABIP BABIP Luck HSV
22.0% .340 .186 .154 ~4

Clearly, Justin has been more than a little lucky. That BABIP is going to come up and with it his ERA. The rest of his BIP stats suggest he’s likely to remain successful, though. His GB/FB rate has improved by about 33% and his infield fly rate is nearly 300% higher. One has to wonder, though, are those stats based on anything other than small sample size?

Well, there is a potential explanation. Germano has said that he has worked extensively on improving his changeup and the number suggest he’s certainly more comfortable throwing it. He has thrown it twice as often this season as he did last season. 18.6% of his pitches this year have been changeups. His increase in changeups has come at the expense of his curveball which he threw 28% of the time last year. While this does not mean anything concrete, it certainly gives us reason for optimism with Germano.

(Note: this was inspired by R.J. Anderson’s analysis of Edwin Jackson at Beyond the Box Score.)

Player Profile: Scott Hairston

Since arriving in San Diego at the deadline last year, Scott Hairston has hit a ridiculous .304/.357/.696 in 112 plate appearances. That stands in stark contrast to his previous 594 Major League plate appearances in which he hit .238/.293/.407. This raises the question, which sample is more predictive of Hairston’s future performance?

(Note: Click Images to View Full Size)

Photobucket

Baseball America’s JC Player of the year, Hairston was selected in the third round of the 2001 amateur draft by the Arizona Diamondbacks. In Rookie ball, he hit for both average and power while commanding the strike zone. He followed up with an even more impressive year split between Low A South Bend and High A Lancaster finishing tied for the minor league lead in extra-base hits.

Photobucket

Following his first full season of pro ball, Hairston was being considered a top prospect. Unfortunately, in 2003 he missed six weeks of the season with a pulled muscle in his back which also negatively impacted his numbers during the month in which he attempted to play through it. Fortunately, Hairston demonstrated no ill effects in the Arizona Fall League. Prior to Spring Training 2004, Baseball America wrote, “Hairston’s total package at the plate could result in Gary Sheffield-like production. He runs well enough to reach double-digits in steals, but won’t to be the threat on the bases that his brother is.”

Photobucket

Throughout 2004 and 2005, Hairston continued to hit in the minors, but at the Major League level he, according to Jim Callis, “developed a tendency to overswing and lost his plate discipline.” And now he found himself buried on the organizational depth chart behind Carlos Quentin, Chris Young, Justin Upton and Carlos Gonzales. This was proven to be the case when even with a strong year in 2006, he was only able to earn a part time role in 2007 before finally being traded to the Padres for Leo Rosales.

Photobucket

Since being traded to the Padres, Hairston’s batted ball distribution has changed dramatically. He is hitting far more fly balls than he previously did and more than twice as many of them are clearing the outfield fences. That seems counterintuitive because in moving from Arizona to San Diego, he moved from a hitters’ ballpark to a pitchers’ park. However, if you look at the Home Run Park Factors page linked to the right, you’ll see that PetCo is actually easier to hit home runs to center field and left center field than Chase Field and equally easy to hit to left field.

Still a HR/F% of nearly 20% is not sustainable. His Line Drive % is also about half what Hairston has previously put up so a regression back toward his previous levels will help to balance out some of the lost value. Also, his improvement in pitches per plate appearance is definitely repeatable and likely shows a change in approach.

Overall, Hairston’s track record supports an optimistic outlook. While, Padre fans can expect a severe drop from his nearly .700 slugging percentage, it isn’t unreasonable for them to also expect a continued high level of play.